HOME

Archives: News

  • Republican Wins Inspire Hope for MMTLP

    Republicans and Donald Trump effectively wiped the map red on Election day, and many are seeing a resolution for MMTLP because of it.

    In was a decisive win for the GOP, or probably better called MAGA now. The Presidency was decided without doubt, Republicans took control of the Senate, and the House is likely a GOP victory as well.

    Why is the community hopeful? With little exception, Republicans have been far more friendly to the MMTLP cause over the last 700 days.

    The open letter from congressional members was lopsidedly signed by more Republicans than Democrats. I could never even get a call back from my Democratic local representative.

    And we know of two major allies in government after these election results.

    JD Vance, who signed an MMTLP letter previously, will soon be the Vice President. That’s some clout for our case.

    In addition to this, Chris Rose won his Senate seat in West Virginia. Chris was a great supporter of the MMTLP case while running for office, and he’s even indicated after winning he has our back.

    And then there’s the fact that Donald Trump had his own company stock, DJT, short-sold to death. Say what you want about Trump, but since it happened to him and his pocketbook, he’s likely to seek a resolution for naked short-selling during his term. And it would seem unheard of for him to work on DJT stock without solving MMTLP as well.

    And finally, Donald Trump’s right-hand advisor is now Elon Musk. Tesla has suffered severe abusive shorting over the years as well. Musk has mentioned this in the past. I’d bet that an investigation into Tesla shorting is also on the horizon.

    Trump was previously in control of the White House. And nothing happened to alleviate naked shorting. But this time it’s different. This time, he himself has been affected. That might just be the stars aligning for an MMTLP resolution and, finally, some justice for shareholders.

    Also, don’t forget Trump has promised to fire Gary Gensler on Day 1.

    https://twitter.com/JakeGagain/status/1817297227330605271

    I wouldn’t want to be Ken Griffin right now, either.

    Let’s see how this one plays out.

  • FOIA Requests Indicate NBH’s Efforts to #SaveOrogrande

    Recently, we learned that University Lands would not be renewing Next Bridge Hydrocarbons’ lease. Now, we have their response.

    A FOIA request (wow, that was quick) has revealed the notification from University Lands, along with a message from Next Bridge’s attorneys, which appears to signal their intention to challenge the decision.

    The Orogrande property was Next Bridge Hydrocarbons’ largest asset, offering significant potential for oil and natural gas. The company has invested millions of dollars over the years to develop this land, only to lose it. However, it seems that Next Bridge is prepared to fight this outcome.

    Let’s see how this one plays out. #SaveOrogrande

  • Community Divided Over Shareholder Motivations

    The community on X is experiencing frequent internal conflicts, with debates often arising about whether actions are being taken for the right reasons.

    This kind of discord isn’t new—after more than 680 days of financial loss and tensions between prominent figures in the community, it’s not surprising that harmony remains elusive.

    Recently, these tensions have escalated around Scott Traudt, who has filed a lawsuit in Vermont. Traudt is making progress in the courts as he attempts to bypass arbitration and obtain discovery related to MMTLP. He has shared messages about gathering evidence of share ownership and pursuing answers from Greg McCabe of Next Bridge Hydrocarbons.

    This move has caused a rift within the community, especially among those who support McCabe and now see Traudt as an adversary for questioning the intentions of the Next Bridge CEO.

    However, messages from John Brda have shown support for both McCabe and Traudt’s legal efforts, but a correspondence shared by community member Jen includes statements from McCabe himself that are a bit more direct against Traudt.

    https://twitter.com/JunkSavvy/status/1848447139451752473

    This is all a bit too much drama for ourselves at MMTLP Resources, and we have debated on whether even posting this as “news,” but it does contain some information relevant to our continuing journey.

    Ultimately, we don’t think any MMTLP shareholders are working for the wrong side. But we have a community of diverse people all with different ideas on how it should be resolved, and undoubtedly, there will be some conflict.

    Let’s hope over time we find out more. We all could use some good news about now as we approach the 2-year mark of the U3 Halt.

  • News Article Links DJT and MMTLP

    A new article out on the Gateway Pundit discusses the problems with DJT stock as well as MMTLP.

    In an article primarily about Donald Trump and his DJT and DWAC stock and election interference, MMTLP is also discussed. An interview with Julianne Jay, an MMTLP Shareholder is also included.

    Our situation of counterfeit shares and naked shorts are definitely similar between Trump’s companies and our Oil play.

    This is the second recent article discussing MMTLP from the Gateway Pundit. The previous article, which also featured shareholder Julianne Jay, is linked here.

    Will Trump help MMTLP (and himself with DJT) if he gets elected in 2 weeks? We all hope so.

  • Scwab Doesn’t Contest Loss of Evidence

    In the ongoing trial Scott Traudt v. Schwab, Et.al., Schwab does not contest allegations of evidence “spoilation”.

    Reported on X by Scott, Schwab did not contest the fact that they “lost” evidence which include an audio recording where a TDA (now acquired by Schwab) broker said that they asked for the trade halt to protect themselves since MMTLP was trading at 100x the market value. This would equate to around $290 a share.

    Interesting that this evidence would be lost.

    Legally (not legal advice), this destruction or loss of evidence could make those claims by Traudt
    undisputed facts for purposes of the motion, which is excellent news.

    It’s hard to keep up with all the action in Traudt’s case against Schwab and others, there are a lot of moving parts and news almost daily.

    There have been some additional FOIA emails released that are related to our case as well.

    Be sure you are following @Greenhills303 for the latest updates.